1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 113 kg more than 2010 Cadillac STS.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (368 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
| Model | Blazer | STS |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4296 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 368 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1802 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1844 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1463 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2957 mm |
