1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 200 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. (160 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Blazer | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4296 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
