1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (160 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Blazer | Epica |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4296 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
