1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero (163 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 375 kg more than 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero (373 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Blazer | Pajero |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4296 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2790 mm |