1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2010 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2010 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Subaru Tribeca (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Tribeca should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 46 kg more than 2010 Subaru Tribeca.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Subaru Tribeca. (335 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Subaru Tribeca.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2010 Subaru Tribeca | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Blazer | Tribeca |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4296 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 335 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1869 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1687 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2748 mm |