1996 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Blazer | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Blazer | Matrix |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4296 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2601 mm |