1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1950 Holden FX

To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 5,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (255 HP) has 204 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 587 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (380 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chevrolet Camaro 1950 Holden FX
Make Chevrolet Holden
Model Camaro FX
Year Released 1996 1950
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5731 cc 2165 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 255 HP 51 HP
Torque 380 Nm 136 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1557 kg 970 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4380 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2620 mm