1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1953 Maserati A6GCM
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (200 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. (194 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 930 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1953 Maserati A6GCM | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
Model | Camaro | A6GCM |
Year Released | 1996 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 194 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 570 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2290 mm |