1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1958 DKW Munga
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (255 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1958 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 447 kg more than 1958 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1958 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Camaro | Munga |
Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5731 cc | 978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1557 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2010 mm |