1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1958 Maserati 300
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Maserati 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Maserati 300 would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 192 more horse power than 1958 Maserati 300. (243 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1958 Maserati 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 437 kg more than 1958 Maserati 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1958 Maserati 300 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
| Model | Camaro | 300 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6276 cc | 2992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 1 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 435 HP | 243 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2320 mm |
