1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1958 Suzuki Light
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Suzuki Light. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Suzuki Light would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1958 Suzuki Light. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1958 Suzuki Light. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 873 kg more than 1958 Suzuki Light. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Suzuki Light. (34 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Suzuki Light.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1958 Suzuki Light | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Camaro | Light |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 3349 cc | 359 cc |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 34 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2010 mm |
