1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1961 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. (339 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 688 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1961 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Camaro | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6276 cc | 6638 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 1 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 435 HP | 339 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2880 mm |
