1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 417 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 687 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (576 Nm) has 544 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Camaro | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 6276 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 435 HP | 18 HP |
| Torque | 576 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2060 mm |
