1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1963 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 383 more horse power than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 327 kg more than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1963 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Camaro | 1500 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 1 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 52 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2410 mm |