1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1967 Seat 1500
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (200 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1967 Seat 1500. (71 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1967 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 340 kg more than 1967 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1967 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Camaro | 1500 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1479 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 71 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2660 mm |