1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1968 Daihatsu Compagno
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Daihatsu Compagno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Daihatsu Compagno would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 400 more horse power than 1968 Daihatsu Compagno. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1968 Daihatsu Compagno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 422 kg more than 1968 Daihatsu Compagno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (576 Nm) has 510 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Daihatsu Compagno. (66 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Daihatsu Compagno.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1968 Daihatsu Compagno | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daihatsu |
Model | Camaro | Compagno |
Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 797 cc |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 35 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 66 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 765 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2230 mm |