1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1970 NSU 1200
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 NSU 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 NSU 1200 would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1970 NSU 1200. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1970 NSU 1200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 NSU 1200. (81 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 NSU 1200.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1970 NSU 1200 | |
Make | Chevrolet | NSU |
Model | Camaro | 1200 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3349 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 81 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 69.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2240 mm |