1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1975 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 408 more horse power than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (576 Nm) has 539 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Camaro | LJ 20 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1975 |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 27 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 37 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |