1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1977 Subaru 1400
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Subaru 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Subaru 1400 would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Subaru 1400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1977 Subaru 1400 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Camaro | 1400 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 1361 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |