1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1980 Kia Brisa

To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Kia Brisa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Kia Brisa would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (200 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1980 Kia Brisa. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1980 Kia Brisa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 710 kg more than 1980 Kia Brisa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Kia Brisa. (68 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Kia Brisa.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chevrolet Camaro 1980 Kia Brisa
Make Chevrolet Kia
Model Camaro Brisa
Year Released 1996 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 983 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 53 HP
Torque 305 Nm 68 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 790 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2270 mm