1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1983 Mazda 929
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (200 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 929. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 350 kg more than 1983 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1983 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | 929 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2620 mm |