1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1983 Mazda 929
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 346 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 929. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 37 kg more than 1983 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (576 Nm) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda 929. (160 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1983 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | 929 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 160 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2620 mm |