1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 313 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (122 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 240 weights approximately 123 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (576 Nm) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (170 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Camaro | 240 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 122 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2660 mm |