1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 7 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Camaro | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1996 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2630 mm |