1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1984 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 5,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (255 HP) has 174 more horse power than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 637 kg more than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (380 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1984 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1984 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5731 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 380 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 71.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1557 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 57 L |