1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1984 Skoda L
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Skoda L would be higher. At 5,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (255 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1984 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1984 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 729 kg more than 1984 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (380 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1984 Skoda L | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | Camaro | L |
Year Released | 1996 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5731 cc | 1046 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1557 kg | 828 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |