1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1988 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 5,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 407 kg more than 1988 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1988 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Chevrolet | Plymouth |
Model | Camaro | Reliant |
Year Released | 1996 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5731 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1557 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2260 mm |