1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1988 Zastava 750
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 402 more horse power than 1988 Zastava 750. (33 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1988 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 547 kg more than 1988 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (576 Nm) has 521 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Zastava 750. (55 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1988 Zastava 750 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | Camaro | 750 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1988 |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 33 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 55 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2010 mm |