1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1995 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1995 Mazda RX-7. (238 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 113 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (576 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1995 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 238 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 296 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2430 mm |