1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1997 Mazda SW-X
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 82 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Mazda SW-X has automatic transmission and 1996 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mazda SW-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1997 Mazda SW-X | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Camaro | SW-X |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 435 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1105 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2620 mm |
