1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1997 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1997 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 312 more horse power than 1997 Toyota 4Runner. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1997 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 663 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1997 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (576 Nm) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Toyota 4Runner. (295 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1997 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Camaro | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1996 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 2980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 295 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 21.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |