1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (255 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 291 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (380 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan C 52. (354 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan C 52. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 1996 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Camaro | C 52 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5731 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1557 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2830 mm |
