1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Renault Scenic II

To start off, 2003 Renault Scenic II is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (200 HP) has 117 more horse power than 2003 Renault Scenic II. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Scenic II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 220 kg more than 2003 Renault Scenic II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Scenic II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Scenic II. (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Scenic II.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chevrolet Camaro 2003 Renault Scenic II
Make Chevrolet Renault
Model Camaro Scenic II
Year Released 1996 2003
Body Type Coupe Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 1461 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 83 HP
Torque 305 Nm 191 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 18.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 1280 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4270 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 60 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]