1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda HR-V weights approximately 70 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2008 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (576 Nm) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Honda HR-V | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Camaro | HR-V |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 1 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 135 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
Top Speed | 276 km/hour | 162 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1257 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2460 mm |