1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Opel Astra
To start off, 2008 Opel Astra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Opel Astra weights approximately 43 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (576 Nm) has 426 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Opel Astra. (150 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Opel Astra.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Opel Astra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Camaro | Astra |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 1589 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 1 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 150 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 276 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2620 mm |