1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2010 Volvo C30

To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (200 HP) has 99 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 49 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chevrolet Camaro 2010 Volvo C30
Make Chevrolet Volvo
Model Camaro C30
Year Released 1996 2010
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 1600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 101 HP
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 1451 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4252 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1783 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1448 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 60 L