1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7
To start off, 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. In terms of performance, 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7 (237 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7 should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7. (265 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Luxgen |
| Model | Camaro | Luxgen7 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 265 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4845 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1876 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1768 mm |
