1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Suzuki Kizashi

To start off, 2011 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 250 more horse power than 2011 Suzuki Kizashi. (185 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2011 Suzuki Kizashi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 283 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 2011 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (576 Nm) has 346 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Suzuki Kizashi. (230 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Suzuki Kizashi.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chevrolet Camaro 2011 Suzuki Kizashi
Make Chevrolet Suzuki
Model Camaro Kizashi
Year Released 1996 2011
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6276 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 1 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 435 HP 185 HP
Torque 576 Nm 230 Nm
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1187 kg 1470 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4651 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1821 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1481 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2700 mm