1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2012 Chevrolet Volt
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Volt is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Volt weights approximately 302 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Volt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 2012 Chevrolet Volt | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | Camaro | Volt |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 35 L |
