1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 121 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (314 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 766 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (576 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (373 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1996 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chevrolet Camaro 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Chevrolet Cadillac
Model Camaro CTS
Year Released 1996 2013
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6276 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 1 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 435 HP 314 HP
Torque 576 Nm 373 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 11.3
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1187 kg 1953 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4877 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2880 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]