1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 522 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (576 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ferrari California. (504 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ferrari California.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 2013 Ferrari California | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ferrari |
| Model | Camaro | California |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 435 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 576 Nm | 504 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4562 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1308 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2670 mm |
