1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Lexus RX
To start off, 2013 Lexus RX is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lexus RX (291 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lexus RX weights approximately 550 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lexus RX (317 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. (305 Nm). This means 2013 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 2013 Lexus RX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lexus |
Model | Camaro | RX |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 291 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 317 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 12.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1885 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1695 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2740 mm |