1996 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2001 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 4,312 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 60 kg more than 2001 Ford Ranger.

Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Chevrolet Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chevrolet Caprice 2001 Ford Ranger
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Caprice Ranger
Year Released 1996 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4312 cc 2970 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 197 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1850 kg 1790 kg
Vehicle Length 5440 mm 5090 mm
Vehicle Width 1960 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 3010 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]