1996 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 4,312 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (200 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Caprice. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Caprice. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 275 kg more than 2010 Kia Cadenza.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Caprice | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
| Model | Caprice | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4312 cc | 2700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5440 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2845 mm |
