1996 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1978 Volvo 240
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 5,733 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Impala (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 240. (104 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Impala (447 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 240. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Impala | 1978 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Impala | 240 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2650 mm |