1996 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1999 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 1999 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 5,733 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Impala (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1999 Saab 05-Sep. (200 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1999 Saab 05-Sep.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Saab 05-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Impala (447 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Saab 05-Sep. (311 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Saab 05-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Impala | 1999 Saab 05-Sep | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
| Model | Impala | 05-Sep |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5733 cc | 2958 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 311 Nm |
| Top Speed | 222 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2710 mm |
