1996 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (200 HP) has 174 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 864 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Lumina | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Lumina | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3789 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 26 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2060 mm |
