1996 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (200 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 390 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Lumina | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Sunbeam |
Model | Lumina | Tiger |
Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 4259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2190 mm |