1996 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1967 Holden HR

To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (200 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 240 kg more than 1967 Holden HR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Holden HR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Holden HR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Holden HR. (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Holden HR.

Compare all specifications: