1996 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1976 Mazda 818

To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (200 HP) has 132 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 818. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 528 kg more than 1976 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1976 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 818.

Compare all specifications: